Above and beyond?
Or just
above the floor?
He texts back. He arrives when invited. He has discovered the calendar. Lovely. But are we appreciating the basics—or submitting them for an excellence award?
12 questions · About 2 minutes · Free. No sign-up.
ATTENDANCE IS NOT A LOVE LANGUAGE.
Think about what you call exceptional.
A score. A verdict. A paper trail.
A result card made for the group chat.
Entertainment, not relationship science. Appreciating the basics is healthy; this game asks whether you mistake them for exceptional effort. Thoughtfulness does not require money, mind-reading, or constant availability. This is not a measure of anyone’s worth, a safety assessment, or a reason to dismiss a good relationship.
Answer about his usual behavior, not his best-ever Tuesday.
The applause audit.
Let’s check the criteria.
The group chat had a theory.
Now it has an attachment.
How did the lab calculate this?
The first 11 questions contribute 0–5 points each. The final outside-perspective question contributes 0–8, giving it 1.6 times the weight. The full maximum is 63 points. Several answers share zero points because appreciation, thoughtful effort, and fair expectations are not signs of inflated credit. Your score is your total divided by the maximum for the questions you answered, multiplied by 100 and rounded to a whole number. Skipped questions are excluded. Category notes reflect the highest average scores in your answers. The same answers always produce the same result.
This is an entertainment score, not a validated assessment. Different questions and weights would produce different results. Higher scores suggest that ordinary behavior is receiving more exceptional-effort credit in your answers. A low score does not establish that your partner behaves well; the quiz does not test every aspect of the relationship. The categories and cutoffs are editorial, not validated measures.